Scriptural dating vs scientific dating

Old earth creationists view the scientific dating methods as being reasonably accurate and therefore accept that the earth and the universe are truly old. As a ministry, Got definitely leans toward the young earth perspective.

Also, a great number of old earth creationists reject Darwinian evolution. We believe that Genesis chapters 1 and 2 are meant to be read literally, and young earth creationism is what a literal reading of those chapters presents.

In contrast, various scientific dating methods place the age of the earth around 4.5 billion years and the age of the universe around 14.6 billion years.

The options to solve the apparent conflict are as follows: the Bible is wrong, the Bible is being interpreted incorrectly, or the scientific data is being interpreted incorrectly.

Young earth creationists interpret Genesis 1–2 as a literal, historical account of how God created the universe.

Young earth creationists question why, if the rest of Genesis is historical, should the first two chapters be interpreted differently?

According to secular scientists and those who accept an old-earth reading of Scripture, the earth is very old.

They view Genesis 1–2 as being primarily symbolic and/or poetic.Neither old earth creationism nor young earth creationism teaches that the Bible is wrong.Generally speaking, both old earth and young earth creationists believe in the inspiration, inerrancy, and authority of God’s Word. young earth—what are the core issues in the debate?" Answer: Both old earth creationism and young earth creationism seek to solve the apparent conflict between science and the Bible in regard to the age of the earth. If the book of Genesis is interpreted strictly literally, it seems to indicate that the earth and the universe are around 6,000 years old.

Search for scriptural dating vs scientific dating:

scriptural dating vs scientific dating-74

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “scriptural dating vs scientific dating”