Does radiometric dating prove earth old
Steven Austin rightly wonders, "Has anyone successfully dated a Grand Canyon rock? The validity of the calculated date can be no stronger than the weakest link (weakest assumption) used in the calculation.What are some of the assumptions made by most Evolutionists in using these systems?Age estimates which are obviously wrong or contradictory are sometimes produced.A popular and supposedly foolproof method was used on two lava flows in the Grand Canyon that should be ideal for radioactive age estimation. Young basalt rock at the Canyon's top produced an age estimate 270 million years older than ancient basalt rock at the Canyon's bottom.Net users generous rights for putting this page to work in their homes, personal witnessing, churches and schools. Using radioactive dating, scientists have determined that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, ancient enough for all species to have been formed through evolution.1 The earth is now regarded as between 4.5 and 4.6 billion years old.2 The primary dating method scientists use for determining the age of the earth is radioisotope dating.Most systems promoted by Evolutionists involve radioactivity.Various radioactive elements are involved, including Carbon-14, Uranium-238, Thorium-232, and Potassium-40.
The Carbon-14 age estimating method is, at best, only useful for estimating the age of things that are thousands of years old, not millions or billions.
Theoretically, Creationism remains workable within a wide range of age estimates.
Scientists have proposed numerous age estimation methods.
The speed of the disintegration process is measured.
A portion of the material is ground up and a measurement is made of the ratio of radioactive “parent” atoms to the decomposition products.
Search for does radiometric dating prove earth old:
Radioisotope dating (also referred to as radiometric dating) is the process of estimating the age of rocks from the decay of their radioactive elements.